还剩2页未读,继续阅读
文本内容:
经济发展与环境保护英文辩论赛WhichshouldreceivepriorityinchinaeconomicgrowthorenvironmentalprotectionTheoreticalcliche正方一辩从人类发展的终极目标看,我们要彻底地解决环境问题,必须要标本兼治要治本,必须优先发展经济,从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问题的源头,要治标,同样要优先发展经济,为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、资金等支持,只有这样,才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障Honorablejudgesdistinguishedguestsladiesandgentlemen.Fromtheultimategoalofhumandevelopmentweneedtoaddressboththesymptomsandrootcausestosolvetheenvironmentalproblemsthoroughly.Toeffectapermanentcurewemustgivefirstprioritytothedevelopmentofeconomyandoptimizetheeconomicstructurefundamentallytoblockthesourceoftheenvironmentproblems;Totaketemporarysolutionwealsoshouldgiveprioritytothedevelopmentofeconomysothatwehavethetechnologycapitalandothersupportsforsolvingtheenvironmentalproblems.Onlyinthiswaycanenvironmentprotectionbeprovidedforhumansurvivalanddevelopment.反方一辩经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡经济要发展意味着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来保障商品的供应——那便存在一个问题自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自然资源Honorablejudgesdistinguishedguestsladiesandgentlemen.Theeconomicdevelopmentreferstosocietycanprovideabundantcommoditytoimprovehumanmateriallife;environmentalprotectionistotakecertainpolicymeasurestoprotecttheecologicalbalanceeconomicdevelopmentmeansthatcompaniesneedmoreworkshopandrawmaterialstoensurethesupplyofgoodsthenthereisaproblemthatisnaturelandandrawmaterialstohumanislimitedeconomicprioritydevelopmentwilloccupynatureresourceswhichoriginallydonotbelongtothehuman.二辩盘问Twodebatequestioned反方二辩请问对方一辩,经济是一时之事,环境是万代之事,哪个重要?经济发展慢了,人们还可以吃到饭,环境没了,还能生存吗?Myfellowdebaterspleaseallowmetoask.TheeconomyisthetemporarymatterbuttheenvironmentisofthetenthousandgenerationwhichoneismoreimportantWhenEconomicdevelopsslowlypeoplecanalsoeatrice;howcanwestillsurviveifthereisnoenvironment.正方一辩不好意思对方辩友,恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权并不是说经济优先就不搞环保了,只是环保处于较次的位置,跟中国现状一样,政策虽然说要重视环保,但一般县区还是经济发展优先的,也就有资本的大城市才比较重视搞环保,相信大家心知肚明SorryImafraidthekeypointswedebatetodayaretherightofpriority.Economydevelopmentfirstdoesnotmeantotallyignoretheenvironmentalprotectiontheenvironmentalprotectionisjustintheinferiorposition.JustlikethepresentChinaalthoughthepolicyattachgreatimportancetoenvironmentalprotectioneconomicdevelopmentreceivepriorityinthegeneralcountiesthereisonlycapitalcitieswouldlikelytakeitseriouslytoenvironmentalprotectioneverybodyknowitinourownheart.反方二辩请问正方三辩,如果发展经济优先的话,很可能造成环境成本大于经济效益的情况,这样的经济是发展还是倒退?Excusememyfellowdebaters.Ifeconomicdevelopmentreceivesprioritythenitislikelytheenvironmentalcoststobelargerthantheeconomicefficiencysucheconomydevelopsorbacksup正方三辩这种情况确实有存在,但并不是每时每刻都存在各个行业情况不同,我们不能以偏概全但按你的意思,这种情况下经济效益是负的,那我们改行环境保护优先,就能转亏为盈我不这么觉得Tocausethiskindofsituationistheretrulybutnoteverymoment.Thesituationineachindustryisdifferent;wecannotdrawconclusionsfromonepart.ButaccordingtoyourpointinthiscasetheeconomicbenefitisnegativethenifwechangedenvironmentfirstwecanturnitintoprofitIdontthinkso.正方二辩我们知道环境的保护是预防为主,防治结合,而预防和治理都要依靠技术的发展,那请问对方一辩,如果没有强有力的经济基础支持科学技术发展,那么以科技为支撑的环保从彳可谈起呢?Weknowthattheprotectionoftheenvironmentismainlypreventionandweshouldcombinepreventionwithtreatmentandthepreventionandcontroldependsonthedevelopmentoftechnologythenmyfellowdebatersifthereisnostrongeconomicbasisforscienceandtechnologydevelopmentthendontmentiontheenvironmentalprotectionsupportedbythescienceandtechnology.反方一辩你的问题未免抽象了点科技发展无止尽,经济发展也没尽头,什么时候算得上是“强有力”呢?但是环境保护是迫在眉睫,耽误不起Yourquestionisalittleabstract.Scienceandtechnologydevelopsendlesslysodoseeconomicdevelopmentwhenwillitbeconsideredas“strong”?Butenvironmentalprotectionisimminentwhichcantaffordtodelay.正方二辩请问反方三辩,经济发展是让人们享受到丰富的生活内容,包括衣食住行娱乐,这难道不是现在社会上人们的普遍愿望吗?Excusememyfellowdebaters.Theresponsibilityofeconomicdevelopmentistoletpeopleenjoyarichlifeincludingthebasicnecessitiesandentertainmentisn*titnowthepeoplesuniversaldesire反方三辩人们喜欢的期望的不一定都是好的我相信,人们更倾向于在一个既能享受到生活乐趣,同时又是一个健康和谐自然的环境中生存Peoplesexpectationisnotnecessarilythatgood.Ibelievethatpeopletendtoliveinalifeofhappinessandatthesametimesurviveinahealthyandharmoniousnaturalenvironment二辩小结反方二辩•对方辩友请从事实出发,经济发展不是你我能定的,是自然环境定的,我们必须坚持可持续发展,我们发展经济的同时我们必须高度重视在经济发展过程中的自然环境的保护我们已经为我们的环境付出了很多代价OppositepartydebatespleasetostartfromthefactTheeconomicdevelopmentisnotyouormecandecideitisthenaturalenvironmentWehavetoinsistweonsustainabledevelopmentwhiledevelopingeconomy.Wemustattachgreatimportancetotheprotectionofthenaturalenvironmentintheprocessofeconomicdevelopment.Wepaymuchforourenvironment.正方二辩我们承认我们的国家已经支付了很多钱,甚至牺牲利润的环境,但我们还是应该采取经济建设作为中心任务经济发展必然会付出代价,我们已经在努力使代价降到最低weadmitourcountryhaspaidalotofmoneyfortheenvironmentevensacrificingtheprofit.Butweshouldstilltakeeconomicconstructionasthecentraltask.Theeconomicdevelopmentwilldefinitelypaytheprice;wehavebeentryingtomakethepricetoaminimum.自由辩论正方一辩请问对方辩友,原始社会的人类祖先们环境保护工作做得可谓好了吧,而他们经济发展很落后,所所以才一直过着钻木取火、茹毛饮血的生活,按你们的意思我们应该回归这种生活吗?Excusememyfellowfriends.IntheprimitivesocietyhumanancestorsenvironmentalprotectionworkisgoodbuttothemEconomicdevelopmentisverybackwardsoithasbeenlivingalifeoftheearliestpeopleshouldwereturntothiskindoflifeaccordingtoyourmeaning反方一辩人类祖先确实需要发展经济,但若是在这个过程中砍完了森林,污染了河流,使衣食都不再有保障,恐怕也无法发展下去了我想问的是,核电站是经济发展的产物,但众所周知,几次核电站的泄漏带来了环境的极度恶化,请问你怎么看?HumanancestorsdoneedtodeveloptheeconomybutifcutouttheforestspollutetherivermakingFoodandclothingarenolongerguaranteedinthisprocessTmafraiditcannotdevelopanylonger.WhatIwanttoaskisnuclearpowerstationistheoutcomeoftheeconomicdevelopmentbutitiswellknownthatafewtimesnuclearpowerleakagehasbroughttheenvironmentextremelyworsenedwhatdoyouthinkofit正方二辩首先,我方并没有承诺经济发展就一定会破坏到环境;其次,对方所说的情况只是凤毛麟角;第三,核电站泄漏是科技不力,而经济是科学研究的基础Firstwehaveneverpledgethattheeconomicdevelopmentcertainlywilldestroytheenvironment;secondthesituationyousaidisonlyrare;thirdnuclearpowerstationleakagebecausethetechnologyisnotstrong.Buteconomyisthefoundationofscientificresearch.反方二辩但是核电站可以再建,那些污染了的土地和地下水怎么办?没有了这些,我们的生活怎么办?你愿意生活在核电站附近,还是一片山清水秀之间?ButthenuclearpowerstationmaybereconstructedhowaboutthesepollutedlandandtheundergroundwaterWithoutlandandwaterhowdoesourlifemanageWouldyouliketolivenearbythenuclearpowerstationorbetweenpiecesofbeautifulsceneries正方三辩但是对方辩友请注意,核电站的建造,正是为了千千万万人类的生活用电得到满足有了电,我们的机器可以运作,生产可以兴起,环境总会有办法弥补,我也想问,你愿意生活在两小时停一次电的地方还是用电无忧之处?Pleasenotethattheconstructionofnuclearpowerstationsispreciselytosatisfymillionsofpeopleslivingpower.Withtheelectricityourmachinecanbeoperatedtheproductioncanriseandtheremustbeanywaytomakeupfortheenvironment.Ialsowanttoaskareyouwillingtoliveinaplacetwohoursstopelectricityoraplacewithabundantpower.反方三辩你的意思是破坏了环境然后再去弥补为什么要先污染后治理?为什么要兜这么大一个圈子呢?而且我国的经济建设里程已经证明,先污染后治理是错的,行不通的Youmeantomakeupfortheenvironmentafterdestroyingit.WhymanagementafterpollutionWhytopocketsobigacircleAndtheeconomicconstructionofourcountryhasalreadyprovedthattreatmentafterpollutioniswrongitwontwork.正方四辩我不得不说我方真冤枉是你给的前提,说核电站泄漏了,严重污染了环境,而我方坚信是可以挽救的而且事实上,包括核电站在内的很多工业厂子,都种有青草绿树,他们在搞经济的同时,并没有放弃环境的保护Icannotbutsaythatwearereallyundeserved.Itisyouwhogivethepremisesaidthatthenuclearpowerstationleakagehaspollutedtheenvironmentseriouslybutwebelievedthatiscanbesaved.Andinfactincludingnuclearpowerstationsmanyindustrialfactoriesplantallkindsofgreengrassandtreeswhiletheypracticetheeconomytheydonotgiveuptheprotectionoftheenvironment.反方四辩但是仅仅不放弃就可以吗?再怎么注意也无法保证无污染,这样日积月累下来依然会是一片惨状必须把环境保护放在第一位,每个工厂都严抓,才能从根本上阻止环境的恶化ButonlydoesnotgiveuppossibleHoweverdowepayattentiontotheenvironmentwecannotguaranteetherewillbenopollution.Astimegoesonitwillstillbeamiserablesituation.Sowemustplacetheenvironmentalprotectioninthefirstplaceeachfactoryshouldbemanagedstrictlyonlyinthiswaycanwepreventtheenvironmentfromworseningfundamentally.反方四辩过去的发展道路走的就是先污染后治理的模式,结果呢,环境问题突出,局部地区已经到了威胁生存的程度再者,先污染后治理的模式不但成本高,而且治理效果也不理想,处于一种被动的境地因此,必须从源头开始防止污染,也就是发展过程首先考虑对环境的影响,只有这样,才能有望在将来解决环境问题Thepastdevelopmentroadisamanagement-after-pollutionpatterntheresultistheenvironmentproblemsstandingoutandsomeareasevenreachtheextentwhichthreatsurvival;Furthermoremanagement-after-pollutionpatternnotonlycostshigherbutalsoisinefficientsometimesinapassiveposition.Thereforewemuststarttopreventpollutionfromthesourcethatistoconsiderthepossibleinfluenceontheenvironmentduringthedevelopmentprocess.Onlyinthiswaycanweexcepttosolveenvironmentproblemsinthefuture.正方四辩•首先,我是一个支持环保的人,拥有一个健康的生态环境是可持续发展得以进行的前提但是,如果一味的保护环境,而忽视经济发展,那么对于经济的发展不利,对于人们生活水平的提高也同样不利同时,我也必须强调,经济发展绝对不是破坏环境,那样的发展,也是违背自然规律的在发展经济的同时,我们要兼顾治理环境,才是当今可持续发展经济的理念FirstIamasupporterofenvironmentalprotection.Havingahealthyecologicalenvironmentisthepremiseofthesustainabledevelopment.Butifweblindlyprotecttheenvironmentandneglecttheeconomicdevelopmentthenithasnotanygoodforbotheconomicaldevelopmentandpeoplelivingstandard.AtthesametimeImuststressthattheeconomicdevelopmentnotnecessarilydestroytheenvironmentsuchdevelopmentalsoviolatesthenaturallaw.Whiledevelopeconomywemustgivedualattentiontotheenvironmentalprotectionthisistheconceptofsustainableeconomicdevelopment.。